Feedback on what to do next would be appreciated. x:
4 Likes
Giving a proper name would be a start.
Also, I’m getting errors.
You should know that it’s Malice’s style to give her songs numbers. I hope she doesn’t change that any time soon.
I never paid attention. I guess that is a good thing.
Yeah, I’ve seen them in New content and such, but I was just thinking of them being scraps, I never notcied a full song or w/e being a number.
Also, I said it’s a good thing I guess is that she is consistant with it. It’s nice to have personal flair.
The purpose of the numerical index is to provide an alternative way to index my songs chronologically (as opposed to the date), and also because the tedious process of picking names sometimes takes too omg or distracts me from working…
Most of these numerical works are known to be either original loops or loops made out of bits and pieces of other compositions. Until I actually finish an original of these numbered works, I don’t mind calling them scraps.
It’s only been my style since last year or so… It might change with time, especially if I include works prior to the numbering system (this will put the whole system out-of-line), but I like the way it works.
Dusty, are the errors occurring on both players or the new? I personally use the old player more because that’s how it was crafted to sound, but I would like to know some about these writes you’re having, if you don’t mind. c:
I think what would be cool is if you treated this whole beginning section as an intro (and an awesome one at that). Then go into a section that follows a bit more of a pattern… and use some organs… kinda of like “boss battle” music.
I understand the number thing, that’s pretty neat actually.
The error did occur on both, but yours wasn’t the only song. It’s working now.
I can tell by listening to most of your songs, you like video games? x3 So do I. lol By the way, nice song! I especially like your percussion line! x)