I think we’ve all had the experience of having to change the panning of every single tuba, modifying the volume of the flutes, or eliminating the disastrous trumpet part. I have two suggestions: A formatting paintbrush or a find and replace command. The paintbrush will work like this: every click will change the panning, volume, etc. of a note to that of the options on the bottom. The find and replace command will change every note that fits the criteria set by the user in the section or entire song, to that of the options specified. What do you guys think?
I easily agree with this, I once accidentally made an entire solo at 300% which was too loud. Also we need to be able to enter a number like the note duration under volume, just to make life so much easier.
I would love something like this. Then endings that fade will be easier to make.
Hey I’ve got a good way to replicate the paint brush option thing. What you should do is set the note you want on the bottom, as well as panning and volume, and go to an unused layer and place the notes. Theoretically this would take as much time as the paint brush idea and although it’s not exactly perfect, it should work right?
I don’t get it… that’s not what the paint brush does at all. sounds look your calling us stupid for making the mistakes that the paint brush would fix…
Well I don’t exactly understand you. The paintbrush’s idea is to change a note’s volume and panning with a single click, how is your idea like that?
IN other words, he put, “Well why don’t you change it beforehand, stupid?” Well, Starwars, people do make mistakes.
Who’s “he”?
Starwars
I don’t know which of your comments are more confusing. :S
Hey I was just trying to be helpful! I’ve believe I’ve said before that I NEVER insult people directly over the internet.
Let me explain. In the paintbrush idea, you set your note settings on volume, panning and duration in the little box on the bottom, then click over the notes you want to change. With mine, you set the settings and then select the instrument you want, place them on a new layer, and then delete the old layer, thus achieving the same thing, unless I have missed something about the paint brush.
Oh… sorry. but still, this idea would take a lot longer, with the paint brush, you could just wave over the note and it would change, just like when you put paint on paper. If you just move your mouse around really fast, that whole layer would change pretty fast. doing your idea, If your like roasty and you use all 9 layers (or else your not doing it right), then you don’t have an extra layer to do your idea.
But you can do this idea already.
That’s the idea. This way we won’t have to wait for Starburst to implement a new feature for it to be used.
Ahh I see now. I thought you were suggesting a new feature or something.
I am sure the gloss is very busy with their lives, and we also do more important things such as editing a nightmare finish for the beta, and the style of type and description of options and can not go in around doing things like that once.

I am sure the gloss is very busy with their lives, and we also do more important things such as editing a nightmare finish for the beta, and the style of type and description of options and can not go in around doing things like that once.

I’m sure Starburst is really busy with his life, and also doing more important stuff (such as finishing editing the nightmare beta, and having the genre and description options) and he won’t be getting around to doing stuff like that for a while.
I am noticing similarities.
At first, I thought your “I am noticing similarities” posts were just a joke. Then I began to realize how right your observations were. Gentlemen, what we’re dealing with here may be the most intelligent bot to ever step into our territory…or maybe that’s Jhoan in disguise and he’s just plagiarizing shit.
[quote=“Anthony”]
They’re evolving.
They’re evolving.
I believe you’ve said this many times before.