George: Goodbye’s was pretty good. A few bad notes here and there and some drums were louder than others but like I said good.
FEATURE THIS. NOW!
You know, I’m not as opposed to this idea as I was when I posted the song.
It’d be kinda funny to have two broken collabs featured at once. Also, as my rules stated, there’s no problem because it’s a collab, the only time a collab should be considered not feature worthy is when the song is by the same exact two users that have another collab featured. My vote’s neutral on this song, I love it but I don’t really care that much if it gets featured. Bear in mind that Cartrox’s vote counts as two votes since it’s not his song.
I do really like it, but there are few problems I have with it. So I vote neutral too. 
Although flattered I’m not overly concerned if it is or isn’t featured.
This song was featured without any activity here, so I’m putting it here for approval. This post doesn’t count as two votes because I’m voting against it, personally I see Utopia as a better song. You’ll need at least four votes Muse.
I see utopia as a better song also, sorry negative vote here 
stands in disbelief
Well i say yes…i happen to be the first unfortunately 
and no to the collab…(negative)
I will add that if Muse states that he’d rather have The Distraught featured than Utopia, both mine and mrteddy’s votes will become moot because they are only negative because of Utopia, not because The Distraught is a bad song or not feature-worthy.
Not be greedy or selfish, but why can’t Distraught be featured if Utopia is?
you can only have one featured song at a time.
Since when was that a rule?! I veto this rule
The feature is the highest recognition you can get (besides, you know, DC or Hypo saying something about it).
When Someone writes an amazing song, no matter if the already have a song up there, it needs to go up there because they deserve it.
Okay, I thought the whole point of integrating my system was so there could be a standard by which we can judge whether a song is feature worthy. Seems every time a rule comes into question we change it.
Personally I see no problems with having multiple songs by the same user up. But when the topic came up about how the mods fell back into the old ways of just featuring songs on a whim, that was the second highest point of concern. I think the rule can be amended to allow for up to three songs by the same user, unless you guys want it stricken completely? Either way my opinion on the song is that it’s feature-worthy but can’t be featured under the current rules.
If HYPE-OH and DEE-SEE came in right now with 5 Collabs, would you be willing to not feature all of them?
But maybe that’s just me…
I also get very happy when I get featured, so I like leniency :3
I featured it because I already saw 3 people say yes IN HIS THREAD, not even here, before I knew about the rule.
These rules are supposed to cover realistic circumstances. Silly GS.
Also if it isn’t obvious I like leniency too, but not the total leniency we had before my rules. I did say in my response that personally I see no problem in featuring Muse’s song, but I have to put that out there.
I do like your rules, I just don’t like this rule. If you want me to change the example to say, Roast posting 4 songs over the next month and not getting 500 views in 10 seconds flat, than that is fine by me. Because that would be awesome.
I’ll just change the limit to three.
On that account, I’ll put Muse’s song back up.
EDIT: Oh wait. Muse, you should decide which version you want featured more.
Thanks a lot.So 3 features?
… feature?
I have a few things to say (im not going to criticize), but whenever I hear a song from you I just don’t like it whenever you start introducing a new melody and start building up, you cut it out right there and release the buildup instead of continuing. Why do I not like this? because the song never really moves anywhere and most songs sound better with a long buildup :. So thats a no for me (oh and don’t pm me after posting this).