I dont have to PM you I can say it here,
A long build up is A personal preference (music is a personal preference)
Thanks for telling me ill think about the build up things
you know you cant just keep building, it will get to cluttered (no im not mad) listen to like John Williams (the best) after alot of big buildups he will get quiet again makes the song “move”
(are you still working on our colab?)
but what you did in the song is not as much of a build up as it is just adding a few layers then removing a few then adding a few layers then removing a few. (and yes im still working on it).
SHUT UP BOT WERE HAVING A CONVERSATION HERE D:
Oh I see (like kaveman 
) I will work on that(I thought about how I was just adding takin’ away layers)
Also it’s a bit short, and also you just keep repeating parts. Maybe if you change parts and also try and add in a verse it would help.
Ah come on nuse and tedd cant you talk about some of the cool stuff, like the soloing (didnt you like it?) and the drums (right, right?)
Well im re-doin’ it sorta…
LOL. Seriously somebody feature QVX’s song!
sorry qvx but its a no from me. The instrument combination is just so out of place and strange.
Really? I liked all the instruments.
I agree with teddy. Also it just didn’t seem very in-key.
Kay… this is gana be my last request for a feature for a while, so I would like you to watch all of them… please, wait until you have time to sit down and watch all of them because you may not like the first one, but you might like the 2nd or 3rd one . (You may want to feature all of them… in that case I can only have 3 features and I already have 1 featured so 3-1… 
… 2?.. YEA 2! So if you like 2 of them feature 2 of um’!!! ) Would that make me the first person to have 3 up there? (awesome… do it.) 
http://notessimo.net/song-65485
http://notessimo.net/song-65400
http://notessimo.net/song-65240
http://notessimo.net/song-65196
http://notessimo.net/song-65108
Did you watch all of them? 
Heh. Clonefan had around 6 when the feature was first implemented.
The Gulch: No. I don’t like how the bass keeps getting cut off, and the song seems to have no direction. Intro was neat but didn’t transition well into the rest of the song, and the song was too short.
Ants in my Pants: Title is a total turn-off, but this gets a yes vote from me. The transitions were the songs biggest downfall, but other then that I really liked the chord progression and the overall ingenuity. Plus it loops.
One or the Other: This is the song QVX helped you with, right? Well the drumming has my approval but the total on and off state of the song really shows. So a no for this one too, and I’d say that’s your biggest problem at the moment, transitioning.
Shining Through: Quite a beautiful melody, but I thought the whole way through that it should have been a piano song. also this song doesn’t loop as well, maybe an actual ending would be better suiting. Quite repetitive as well. No.
The Straight and Narrow: I swear I’ve heard this chord progression somewhere…either way, not quite as good a progression as AimP. Also, this song really felt empty to me. Also some of the transitioning was off. No.
I did that name (Ants in my Pants(revised)) just for fun… i think that is my best song though. how do you delet song posts, because if you could I would rename it… (and i do want to rename it)
If you want to rename it, just go into the song, rename it, and reshare it. That’s not necessary though, I’d rather feature the original anyway. Fun titles can be fun, I only mentioned this because the title would fit to a faster song that has a lot of random craziness going on, whereas this song is slower, and more laid back than expected. It’s not a bad title, in fact I’d say it’s impossible to come up with a bad title by accident, and regardless, the song is great.
Here is the song i would like featured (this is the one StarWars said yes to, just a new name)
eer… Final Fantasy??
Interrupted dream gets my vote.
Thanks G-S
© 2007-2024 Jean-Denis Boivin